Skip to content

Why professionals are rethinking ea right now

Woman in green shirt working at a desk, reviewing documents, with a laptop open in a modern, bright room.

A calendar invite lands at 22:17, the venue changes twice, and a senior leader needs a crisp brief by 08:00. In the middle of that is the ea - the Executive Assistant role - and, for context, the secondary entity (``) that sits alongside it in your workflow. Professionals are rethinking ea right now because the job has quietly become a leverage point: it can either remove friction from the whole organisation, or multiply it.

For years, the ea was treated as a diary manager with good manners and fast fingers. Now it’s increasingly viewed as an operator: someone who shapes how time, information and decisions move.

The ea job hasn’t “changed”. The work around it has.

The modern week is more volatile than it was even three years ago. Hybrid calendars collide, travel is less predictable, and leadership teams expect decisions to be made faster with fewer meetings.

That means the old definition of “support” (book, chase, remind) is struggling. The new definition looks more like: filter, frame, prioritise, protect.

The ea isn’t just managing a diary anymore. They’re managing attention.

In many teams, you can see the shift in small habits. Leaders forward fewer emails and ask instead for a one‑line recommendation. Meeting requests get challenged, not accepted. Information gets summarised before it hits the exec’s brain.

What’s driving the rethink right now

It’s not one trend. It’s a pile‑up of pressure points that all land on the same role.

1) Hybrid work has made “access” messy

When everyone was in the office, you could read the day by walking past someone’s desk. Now the real context is scattered across Slack, Teams, email threads, voice notes, and half‑updated calendars.

A strong ea becomes the human index: the person who knows what’s actually happening, not what the tools claim is happening.

2) Leaders are drowning in decisions, not tasks

Most executives aren’t short on to‑dos. They’re short on clean decision inputs: what matters, what can wait, what’s risky, and what’s politically sensitive.

That’s why organisations are asking more from ea roles: pre‑reads, stakeholder notes, lightweight project tracking, and “tell me what I’m missing” support.

3) AI has changed the baseline, not the need

AI can draft, summarise and transcribe. It can’t reliably judge tone between two feuding stakeholders, spot a hidden dependency, or decide whether a meeting is genuinely worth the executive’s time.

So the ea’s value is shifting away from typing speed and towards judgement, discretion and sequencing work so the leader can actually lead.

4) Compliance and reputational risk have moved closer to the diary

A diary is not neutral. It contains sensitive names, topics, locations, and patterns. As organisations tighten controls around data, travel, gifts, and meetings with external parties, the ea often becomes the first line of defence.

That’s not “admin”. That’s operational risk management in miniature.

What “high‑performing ea” looks like in 2025

If you’re hiring, managing, or doing the role, it helps to name the shift clearly. Many teams are moving from service to systems.

Old expectation New expectation What it changes day-to-day
Keep the calendar full and tidy Keep time aligned to priorities Saying “no” and reshaping requests
React fast to requests Build pathways that prevent chaos Templates, rules, escalation lanes
Book travel and meetings Protect energy and decision quality Buffers, prep, stakeholder mapping
“Handle inbox” Manage information flow Summaries, triage, context notes

None of this requires the ea to become a junior chief of staff. But it does mean the organisation must stop treating the role like an afterthought.

The quiet signals your team might need to rethink the role

You don’t need a re-org to spot the problem. You can usually feel it in the week.

  • The exec’s calendar is full, but outcomes are thin.
  • Meetings happen because “it was easiest to book”, not because they’re necessary.
  • Stakeholders bypass the ea because it’s quicker, then complain about delays later.
  • Travel changes create knock-on chaos (missed prep time, late arrivals, rushed decisions).
  • The ea spends the day firefighting, with no time to improve the system.

A useful test is simple: does the ea have time to prevent problems, or only time to clean them up? If it’s the second one, the role is under-scoped.

The boundaries professionals are putting in place

The rethink isn’t just “ask more of the ea”. It’s also “define what good looks like, then protect it”.

Make the calendar a strategy tool, not a storage drawer

Professionals are adding basic rules that feel almost rude at first, then immediately calming:

  • No meeting accepted without a purpose and desired outcome.
  • Default to 25/50 minute meetings, not 30/60.
  • Prep time is booked like a meeting, not “if there’s a gap”.
  • Hard stops are real (and enforced by the ea, not the exec’s guilt).

When these rules come from the ea, they work best if the executive visibly backs them. Otherwise, the ea becomes the “bad guy” with no authority.

Introduce triage lanes for requests

One inbox (or one Slack DM stream) makes every request feel equally urgent. Many teams now use three lanes:

  1. Immediate: today, time-sensitive, genuine consequence.
  2. This week: important, needs planning, can be scheduled.
  3. Backlog: good ideas, non-urgent, reviewed on a set cadence.

This small structure stops the ea being punished for doing the right work slowly.

Stop blending “personal assistant” expectations into professional roles

Some leaders still expect life-admin wrapped into the job, often without saying it out loud. The trend is moving the other way: clearer contracts, clearer hours, and fewer ambiguous favours.

Not because anyone has become less helpful, but because blurred expectations create burnout and turnover fast.

How to make the rethink practical (without overengineering it)

The best changes are boring and repeatable. If you manage an ea, or you’re an ea trying to reshape the role, start with a two-week reset.

1) Write a one-page “ways of working” note

Keep it short. Include:

  • Meeting standards (what must be included in a request).
  • Response expectations (what “urgent” actually means).
  • Protected blocks (prep, deep work, travel recovery).
  • Escalation rules (what gets bumped, and who approves).

This is less about control and more about reducing invisible conflict.

2) Build a weekly rhythm that creates breathing room

Many professionals are moving to a simple cadence:

  • Monday: prioritisation and calendar shaping.
  • Midweek: stakeholder follow-ups and project nudges.
  • Friday: a 20-minute review - what slipped, what’s next, what risks are emerging.

That final review is where the ea stops being reactive and starts being preventative.

3) Measure outcomes, not busyness

If you only measure “responsiveness” you’ll reward chaos. Better indicators include:

  • Fewer last-minute meeting changes.
  • Shorter meeting time with clearer decisions.
  • Better-prepared exec appearances (briefs delivered on time, context included).
  • Reduced “where are we on this?” loops from stakeholders.

The goal isn’t to make the ea do more. It’s to make the whole system waste less time.

Why this matters beyond one role

When professionals rethink ea, they’re usually admitting something bigger: time is now the scarcest resource in the organisation, and the calendar is where strategy goes to live or die.

A well-scoped ea role can be one of the highest-return hires a team makes. A poorly defined one becomes an expensive panic button that never stops ringing.

FAQ:

  • Isn’t this just turning the ea into a chief of staff? Not necessarily. It’s about adding light structure and decision support, not owning strategy or leading programmes.
  • What’s the fastest improvement most teams can make? Define meeting request standards and back them publicly. It cuts noise immediately and gives the ea real authority.
  • Will AI replace the ea role? AI will replace some tasks, but the highest-value parts of the role-judgement, prioritisation, discretion, stakeholder navigation-are still deeply human.
  • How do you stop the ea becoming the bottleneck? Create triage lanes and escalation rules. The ea should route work, not hold it hostage, and stakeholders should know the pathway.

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Leave a Comment